Starling Feedback

[Feathers (MikeF)]

This has spun off in an odd direction. Why would anyone want to hijack anything? This feels more like a case of the tone of the forum lying in the eye of the reader rather than the keyboard of the author.

[Rat_au_van (Em)]

I think he can handle it

[anon4562461]

Yeah, some guys turned up from another forum and turned it rather sour.

[danbeddows (Dan)]

@anonymoususer

I honestly think if people went into the Starling Q&A purely to troll it’d be quite pathetic. Starling’s community already didn’t go the way they had planned and thus they ended up shutting it, if someone now ruins the Q&A it could end up with even less communication.

Literally no benefit, like you mentioned, beyond childish also.

that’s a lot hypotheticals .

[anon40728597]

I don’t mean you!

[chistery]

I really don’t like the way the forum allows this, it should put the name of the person who flags it to stop the abuse.

[ChrisLane]

Shame about someone flagging posts.

On the topic of this forum though, I do wish Monzo would be a bit quicker with some features. I love that Monzo takes the time to get things implemented in the best way they can but features such as Flux support on Starling look very attractive to me. Monzo has been in closed testing with Flux for way longer than Starling!

[harryru (Harry)]

To be fair people are most likely flagging it as off topic which is probably true

[cookywook (Richard Cook)]

Closing for now while we deal with the above.

[cookywook (Richard Cook)]

Hey all, I’m leaving this thread closed for now. Unfortunately, it’s repeatedly become off-topic and non-constructive. I’ve had to lock the thread many times and send out a lot of warnings. The history here is sadly too toxic and isn’t the kind of atmosphere we want on our forum.

Feel free to create a new thread instead. But as a reminder, we don’t tolerate posts that break our Code of Conduct so we’d ask that the discussion stays on topic about Starling only.