Oooooooooooooooook then.
Why would anyone want to deliberately sabotage their Q&A? If Tom did this, fans of Monzo would be pissed off if non-Monzo users hijacked the conversation.
I donāt see any benefit and itās pretty childish behaviour.
Where has anyone mentioned sabotage? Feel like Iām missing something.
That is something i raised last summer with themā¦ August 2017!
Iām sure youāre not that naiveā¦
Iām not. Please elaborate on how you came to see that as a threat of sabotage.
Iām all ears. Well, eyes.
This has spun off in an odd direction. Why would anyone want to hijack anything? This feels more like a case of the tone of the forum lying in the eye of the reader rather than the keyboard of the author.
I think he can handle it
Yeah, some guys turned up from another forum and turned it rather sour.
thatās a lot hypotheticals .
I donāt mean you!
I really donāt like the way the forum allows this, it should put the name of the person who flags it to stop the abuse.
Shame about someone flagging posts.
On the topic of this forum though, I do wish Monzo would be a bit quicker with some features. I love that Monzo takes the time to get things implemented in the best way they can but features such as Flux support on Starling look very attractive to me. Monzo has been in closed testing with Flux for way longer than Starling!
To be fair people are most likely flagging it as off topic which is probably true
Closing for now while we deal with the above.
Hey all, Iām leaving this thread closed for now. Unfortunately, itās repeatedly become off-topic and non-constructive. Iāve had to lock the thread many times and send out a lot of warnings. The history here is sadly too toxic and isnāt the kind of atmosphere we want on our forum.
Feel free to create a new thread instead. But as a reminder, we donāt tolerate posts that break our Code of Conduct so weād ask that the discussion stays on topic about Starling only.
A post was merged into an existing topic: Starling Discussion & Feedback