I’d just like to be able to change the colour of virtual cards I’ve already created!
4 Likes
Hi, maybe it has been mentioned, but is there a reason inactive cards are shown? Sometimes I would only ever use a virtual card — once.
And what’s the reason for a limit on 5 cards only?
1 Like
No reason has been given but it is assumed to be cost related as there is also a 100 cards per year limit too.
1 Like
I’m not sure about direct cost, but the limit(s) could be down to a fear of running out of numbers on the current BIN as I believe provisioning a new BIN is rather expensive. 
1 Like
A card number could be reused with a new expiry date and a new CVV code. I guess they will be quarantined for a while then could be made available again.
My understanding is that they work the same way as refunds to a cancelled card. If the merchant presents the refund using the authorisation code of the original transaction it will go through - if they refund it as a new transaction it will fail as any new authorisations are blocked.
2 Likes
I agree completely. The icon in the main feed is labelled with a virtual card icon so I know the transaction was made with a virtual card versus a physical one. I would place more value on seeing the note text under the merchant name as normal so I knew what it was I had bought versus seeing the name of the virtual card that was used.
It’s about which display mode provides me with the most information in the least space. If the icon tells me it was a virtual card transaction and the merchant name is Amazon, then the sub-line below the merchant name is better off telling me this transaction was … my book, my prime subscription, my xbox game etc… because I probably remember which virtual card I assigned to Amazon anyway.
The way it is now, I see it was a virtual card transaction at Amazon but have to tap into the transaction to see what it was for. More work makes me sad. 
1 Like
Vote for it here
2 Likes
This topic was automatically closed 180 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.
I discovered the same carousel entry for VC’s yesterday too, but couldn’t find an appropriate topic to post it in.
Because the appropriate one had been closed.
EDIT: Appropriate topic (this one) now reopened
3 Likes
I wish we could have more than 5 cards, 10 would probably be better.
3 Likes
+1 for this. It’s much needed
2 Likes
What about 5 for Plus, 10 for Premium, would be fine for me 
No no no, why should I have to sign up for two lots of insurance I don’t need or want so k can get 5 more cards! Just no
4 Likes
Conversely, why shouldn’t Monzo charge more for more things that we do want? They’re not a charity after all. There’s a balance to be made there and I don’t know where it is.
1 Like
Ive never said they shouldnt charge to for what you want, however like you’ve said there’s a line somewhere. What I will say is Plus is essentially a software package and should be able to improve the software package rather than fork out what would be an extortionate fee for me because like many others I have no need for their insurance at all!
3 Likes
Exactly, let me have a plus addon for more - e.g. an extra £1 a month gives me another 5 virtual cards.
Rather than an extra £10 for insurance for an already insured phone, travel insurance that won’t cover me (asthma), airport lounges not where I (rarely) fly from/to.
2 Likes
Plus plus £x seems unlikely to me.
The pick and mix idea didn’t work for whatever reasons and I don’t see it coming back, unless Monzo can fully outsource it, like the RAC deal.
Ideally they’ll put them up for Plus and Premium, but otherwise if you want more, you’ll have to upgrade I think.
I guess we will get virtual cards on joint accounts some time in 2122?