Given some of the comments here. Zero.
6 Likes
Reading between the lines, with little or no public transport on Christmas Day, the government have just said âgood luckâ to everyone in tiers 1-3 who doesnât live within walking/cycling distance of their family and doesnât own a car.
Will things be back to normal? No. Absolutely not.
Will things be better than they are this year? Hopefully. But itâll depend on how well vaccines work in real-life, and how well people are able to keep to following guidelines in the meantime. At the very least, I think mask wearing and social distancing will still be required.
1 Like
Mine did, too. But itâs wrong. First page of this
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/1611/pdfs/uksi_20201611_en.pdf
1 Like
Can you cite your source for this?
Wikipedia says the death rate from traffic accidents is 2.9 per 100,000 population in the UK. (The 5.7 figure apparently relates to deaths per 100,000 vehicles). Source: List of countries by traffic-related death rate - Wikipedia
Your quoted death rate from Covid sounds low to me. Weâre up to 70,000 deaths already (source: https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths), and we have a population of about 70 million, and covidâs been here for less than a year, so weâre looking at a rate of at least 100 deaths per 100,000 population per year.
Which suggests that Covid is killing at least 30x more people than car accidents. Which feels right, cos my local hospital has dozens of people critically unwell with Covid, and virtually no critically unwell trauma patients.
5 Likes
Also Iâm not sure when deaths in car accidents/incidents or old people dying from seasonal influenza or whatever the stat of choice themselves became inalienable and so fine to compare to a pandemic as some sort of moderator
Car deaths are too high and banning driving by hooomans probably would cut that
We shouldnât be inured to old people dying from the flu, which similar social distancing and hand washing probably would help with annually
3 Likes
One of the government scientists made the point yesterday. The incidence of flu is expected to be lower this season because of the social distancing etc.
2 Likes
I read a very interesting article earlier in the year during the first lockdown about the (positive in a good way) effect it might have on HIV infections owing to the short window where people are at their most infecting, PREP and lockdown
So maybe 2020 is not a total wash
3 Likes
This gave me a little chuckle as I was reading it. Basically a time line of a few things heâs said about Corona up to what his actions are now 
One day the lot of them will realise that you shouldnât be over promising things in a global pandemic and stop predicting what the future holds. Deal with the facts as they are and leave it at that.
1 Like
It surprises me that a party with such a professed high regard for British history wouldnât recognise the danger of promising it would be all over by Christmas, actually.
3 Likes
Itâs what happens to be fair when youâre out of touch with everything and just full of 
Iâm not sure Iâve witnessed a moment yet this year where is hasnât come back to bite him or other ministers. Itâs always good to laugh at the excuses saying they didnât mean this or that when youâve got the actual clips of whatâs been said.
Prior to the new Tier 4 thing, I had seen plenty of people plan to go back home âa day or two earlierâ than the Travel Window would allow - some of them being sensible: âI will self Isolate at Mum + Dads for a week, have a 2 weeks Christmas, come home and self isolate againâ.
Personally, I wouldnât do it, but given the advice was âWeâre in tier 3 but you can pretty much break all that on the 23rd for a weekâ, I can see the âwhatâs the harm in going a few days earlier logicâ.
I think also everyone is getting Rule Fatigue at this point - Seems the rules change often enough to lose track of it. Obviously not an excuse, but I can at least see people thinking that âIf X is OK, then surely Y should be fine tooâ. At least in some of the âminorâ bending of the rules, not the more egregious rule breaking.
2 Likes
Yes, as of 0001 this morning, my point being it wasnât an offence for anyone who did it yesterday.
I am not saying I agree with what they did, just that it wasnât an offence, as someone stated it was.
Well then all those people who rushed out of London last night, but who came back today wonât commit offences tonight, will they?
Who left yesterday and came back todayâŠthat doesnât make much sense.
Whether or not theyâve committed an offence doesnât matter in the slightest. The resources arenât there to make sure there are consequences and people know that.
2 Likes
Offence or not the bottom line is that itâs reckless and selfish.
All those that risk it for one day are actually risking not seeing their family members ever again or inflicting that on another innocent family.
I couldnât live with either on my conscience so as upsetting as it may be, itâs an easy decision to sacrifice one day for many more in the future.
4 Likes
Darwin Award winners, the lot of them.
1 Like
Not quite the same; Darwin is killing yourself through stupidity, but this is killing others 
1 Like
Actually âsacrificeâ is too strong of a word because thereâs lots of technology available to connect with your family.
Have a zoom call, a few drinks and play some games. Iâve done this a few times now and itâs obviously not as good as being there in person but it was a good laugh - everyone had a great time. You can do the same with opening gifts too.
I even bought a âsnugzyâ so I can be around in my parents home 
