Why? Whatâs wrong with Vodafone?
Everyone is going to have their own preferred network. I would be quite happy it is was Vodafone or EE but would run a mile if it was O2.
Exactly that! Itâll be very much dependent on an individualâs location on preferred network. That said, it does seem that EE covers most.
Seems like a strange move. It almost suggest Monzo doesnât have a huge amount of confidence to expand and innovate within financial services, and has to find alternative revenue streams. Mobile phone contracts are already very competitive, and if Monzo donât control the infrastructure, where can they really innovate?
Anything but Three. Three is so bad near me
Iâd disagree - I dont think offering an additional perk or offering like eSims means they dont have confidence to innovate in financial services ⌠that is a quantum leap
Theyâre quickly becoming a vast company with the resources to work on many things at once
Imagine they offer eSims as part of one of their packaged accounts, there are people whoâd be thrilled by this. It wonât hit the mark for others, but thats just the way it goes
I always feel like Iâm the only fan of O2 ![]()
Being based north west, Vodafone is the better network given the Voda/O2 divide. I was in Liverpool yesterday and O2 is slowly improving, while not as strong as Vodafone, still worked everywhere I needed it to.
Three and EE in parts I frequent are absolutely shocking.
Im really happy with O2 in my area. Literally no issues whatsoever
O2 does not work for even the slowest and lowest data applications anywhere in the centre of Portsmouth, my main reason for shifting to Vodafone, so you couldnât drag me back regardless of the branding
From a business POV I just donât see where the revenue is for Monzo - the big money in mobile is with handsets and long and expensive contracts whereas the SIM only market is awash with lots of very cheap, high data offerings across multiple networks. As I said above itâll be interesting to see where they land on this and what, if anything, they do to make themselves stand out.
Iâm not sure itâs a big money spinner, unless itâs part of some long term strategy that I canât think of. I think the value lies with customer loyalty and âstickinessâ. The more of the things a customer needs which they get through their bank for a reasonable monthly fee⌠the less likely a customer will switch
I think thatâs it. Itâs not that it may be inherently profitable in itself to offer a sim only phone plan as the numbers are likely small, but including such an offering in one of the premium plans could be valuable as a potential customer might look at it and see the perceived value of getting their premium perks - plus their mobile plan - included in a subscription cost that may not be much higher than their existing mobile bill.
So it could be used as a gateway to selling more premium plans rather than an attempt to try and take over the MVNO market
Happy 7th Forumversary
![]()
I agree. Is it for me? Maybe / Maybe not. But I am looking for a deal for everything everywhere and if it works out less expensive and gives the same, or better, service, Iâm in.
Disclaimer: Iâm a Monzo investor and an Honest Mobile investor
Thanks David! Itâs been a time!
Nonsense from CityAM as per usual!
â Westlake argued the âmost striking developmentâ of recent years was the âshrinking of the digital gapâ between big banks and challengers. He said the âcompetitive advantagesâ challengers once had were âno longer uniqueâ. â - I work at one of the incumbents. We wonât come close to closing the digital gap ![]()
If Starling becomes worth more than Monzo at IPO I will cut it off.
So are Monzo going to let this pass by or get involved?