Monzo ⊠warned that the outcome could have a significant impact on its finances.
Monzo said it could not anticipate the outcome or implications of the work but said âthey could be materialâ.
These two statements appear to be contradictory. A statement that they cannot anticipate the results is not a warning.
Also:
The troubled digital bank ⊠issued a warning on Thursday over its ability to remain in business
Did it?
EDIT: I donât think my sarcasm is strong enough here. Obviously it did not. After the abysmal journalism and borderline factual inaccuracies of the first three paragraphs I didnât bother reading any further.
No
Iâm not sure how reliable this news source is as the article seems to be nothing but a bit of Monzo-bashing.
The way I interpret the review of fincrime processes is that they havenât closed enough accounts rather than frozen accounts unnecessarily (which is what the writer of the article alludes to)
I assumed it means that the regulators are asking questions about Monzoâs compliance with financial crime rules and it may cost a lot to correct⊠especially if they have to run those checks on existing customers as well.
In reference to another thread, it alsoleads me to think that Monzoâs fraud detection systems are not as good as they thought they were
The bank has been freezing and closing certain accounts in recent months in order to comply with anti-money laundering regulations, provoking anger among some customers.
Maybe they can go on Watchdog (again)?
This is where I think Monzo needs to be a bit more transparent and give us some data. It would massively help the negative attitude of it.
"We applied sanctions to 0.03% of our accounts. Of those accounts, 98.7% were terminated. The remaining 1.3% were restored.
Or whatever the numbers are.
Maybe Iâm a cynic, but thereâs rarely smoke without fire. âIâve done nothing wrong!! All I did was and now theyâre closing my accountâ
The stories you read online, everyone is always innocent. I take them with a punch of salt.
I agree with you completely. But, let me add a few things in (that donât change how much I agree with you).
Some people believe theyâre innocent because theyâre of the mindset of âI didnât do anything wrongâ, which is an educational thing that you shouldnât be sharing your account with random people online.
Additionally, I think thereâs a lot of people that probably want to appear in the news etc, and it doesnât make a great news story if you openly admit that youâre at fault.
Finally, I donât think itâs about âdoing something wrongâ in some cases, itâs doing something thatâs deemed inappropriate by Monzo, which might be perfectly fine & dandy elsewhere. Which again, is fine, itâs people not reading T+S before etc.
See also; âMy son didnât realise these ÂŁ100 xbox points would appear on my credit card statement and now heâs doing a sad faceâ
Modern news reporting is about clicks and driving revenue not about quality reporting pick the sections to support the story rather than an informed balanced piece.
How many journalists are qualified to interpret statutory financial statements.
This topic is for Monzo in the media. That link is not to an article in any news outlet.
Itâs a companyâs blog.
âRiskScreen is a next-generation customer screening and customer data analytics solution, built to facilitate frictionless internal data economies in which the data held on customers can be used to maximum effect in the management of financial crime risk.â
Given this, perhaps that post and all discussion of it should be split out into another thread, perhaps titled âRandom company with a vested interest in the sector presents their own âimpartialâ * cough*cough * view in a blog postâ?
ETA: F*** me, did a Google search on âfinancial crime control frameworkâ, because the phrase intrigued me and I wanted to find out more about it.
One of the first results? A Times article. Big familiar, though.
Oh, wait. The company linked above have plagiarised the Times article for their blog. F*** me. Maybe it should stay in this thread after all, but with a big warning to everyone that they shouldnât ever deal with RiskScreen because they clearly donât have any problem stealing stuff from other people. Must be better to cut out the middleman and find these other people yourself.
Final edit: forgot the proof (only a preview, as paywalled. But thatâs more than enough)
Soz man, I came across it and I thought Iâd share
Thatâs behind a paywall, can you provide some info about what the article is, title etc?
I stopped reading after the intro:
You know which direction it is going to go in nextâŠ
If you google the headline and go onto news you get thisâŠ
Youâll see the article and it allowed me to read it (as a non sub)
EDIT:
TLâDR Version/summary of what the article says;
-
All Monzo users are hipsters
-
Monzo donât have a clear business model
-
It should be working harder to make the most of its deposits
-
It hoovers up deposits from investors and âsitsâ on them
Monzo doesnât have a clear business model
I know - this is just ridiculous.
Thereâs nowhere in SE London you can get a Negroni for ÂŁ6âŠ
Iâm so common I had to Google what one was
Oh, Iâd love to Google the headline, and get around the paywall ⊠but the headline isnât displayed anywhere.