With Paypal the needle was tipped too far in favour of the buyer, because they could claim any number of problems and Paypal would refund the money instantly, and the seller would have to jump through an insane number of hoops to prove their case and still not always get their money back.
With direct bank payment, it does sound like the needle could tip drastically the other way on the face of it, with the buyer having the money so the seller is SOL. But, surely eBay must be aware of this possibility have have accounted for it in some way. For example:
Setting up a bank link also sets up a direct debit, and in the case of a dispute eBay debit the money from the seller.
Sellers already have to pay fees, so in the event of a dispute, the charges/refunds are added to what the seller owes eBay when they pay their invoices.
Sellers have to do enhanced verification so that in the event of a dispute, eBay can give the buyer all the information they need to know to take the seller to small claims court.
So there are things eBay could do. Whether they will do anything, who knows. All I know is that it has been over a decade now since I stopped using eBay and I still don’t regret that one bit.
Sold something on Weds, payment shows in my eBay account minus all the fees so no shocks at the end of the month, they processed payment to me yesterday and I’ve just got the notification to say I’ve been paid.
Maybe a tiny bit slower as I could have taken the money on Weds with PayPal, but overall no worse an experience really.
I think the real test will be when there’s a problem. As a buyer you always knew that PayPal has your back and even as an honest seller, it’s horrible. So I guess that’s a test for another day.