And there is still no apology or remorse from the OP
Well Iâve learned something new from reading this â Guided Access!
I learned that, as a group, we still confuse security and privacy.
The question I always have for people who raise âsecurityâ issues that are actually privacy issues is; âif you hand me your unlocked phone, can I access your email?â
Itâs all very well having your windows made out of the toughest frames, with the strongest glass and a multi-point locking system, but if youâre going to leave the front door open anywayâŠ
No it requires touch ID
The Santander app widget shows the current account balance without authorisation.
You need to activate the Santander feature in the app first. That was the OPâs whole point about Monzo.
Is this a good or bad time to resurrect my war on toggles?
Go for it, although this one has more merit than most.
It doesnât worry me but I can see the need for a control mechanism for this within the app rather than outside it. Purely because itâs an external feature, hiding the enabler behind whatever app security the user chooses to use makes some sense.
So for this privacy feature Iâd allow a toggle.
just as a noteâŠ
I raised this through chat who after being passed around 5 different specialists have confirmed itâs a bug
the funny thing is itâs likely not a bug because of working exactly as intended at the time. I would say they probably forgot it existed from working on other things for the last few years. It may be on a todo list somewhere of features that need improving, or if it wasnât hopefully is now.
Yeah, a bug is something that doesnât work as designed. This looks like it works exactly as it was designed to. The question here is whether the design is appropriate, not whether the code is flawed in some way.
Probably less damaging to go
these days, rather than âin hindsight it should have probably been auth from inside the app but we did it quickly and thought it was cool at the time. Youâre probably one in 4 million customers that knows it does that, even the devs that wrote the code forgot it did that.â
Customer: Iâve just tapped on x and itâs wiped out my entire balance!!
Customer support: I think itâs a
Customer: oh thatâs fine then.
Yh, i did say I thought it was an oversight rather than bug, but at least theyâre aware I guess
Why is my niece playing on your phone?! Thatâs my big questionâŠ
But in seriousness, I agree with the concept of âthis info should be toggleableâ. I was surprised to see I could see the info on my widget screen, when my phone is locked. It looks like other banks do a good implementation of this too.
Personally Iâm not overly worried about the info being accessible - itâs not like itâs actionable info - other than my friends can relentlessly mock me for how perpetually poor I amâŠ
@BritishLibrary what is your niece going to do when she finds out that info? Carry on playing Angry Birds?
Or was it a reconnaissance mission and you secretly befriended Js38wju3jda in the chance that there might be a situation where your niece could use their phone and you told her to how to access the account balance âpretending to play Angry Birdsâ for your own personal gain.
On a more serious note do people carry large account balances or you know keep it in savings.
Maybe trying to avoid the âYou better get me decent presents this year uncle Js38wju3jdaâ.
This topic was automatically closed 180 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.