That’s the sort of stuff we could have minor-ly deciphered if we were told: Okay, I’ve sent round 1 winner e-mails now to 1000 lucky people! And we all watch the counter go to 927 or 1024.
Or going back 70 posts, an anonymous exit survey:
How much did you pledge?
Did you win?
Did you then invest?
How much did you invest?
Do you prefer a lottery or first come-first served?
Can you think of an alternative method?
Should forum or Monzo users have priority access?
What did you think of free investment sizes?
Should everyone have the ability to invest, at a low investment level?
Would you invest again?
Do you care about pre-emptive rights?
Are you aware of the risks of investing?
Any other feedback?
The advantage being, you can see the weighting of investors Vs non-investors on answers.
Complete OT, but I just watched the vimeo video attached to the latest facebook post (that @alexs has shown above) and to my surprise I see someone who I used to work with (if only very briefly). @marcel_w is that you?
It would be good to have some clarification from the Monzo team - will unsuccessful pledgers be given early access to the current accounts at the same time as the investors from this round or will pledgers be next in line, after the investors?
We don’t have the bandwidth to do this at the moment I’m afraid. The legal implications around sharing non-aggregate data like this would be another consideration. Would it not make more sense to dedicate this effort to focusing on what we can do better in future crowdfunding rounds?
In terms of duplicates, there were a handful of duplicate pledges <10 which were identified and de-duplicated by us. We can’t comment on how many people invested more than what they pledged until we have the full list of investors at which point we can look into this further.
Ah, that’s okay by me. Worth a shot at asking, thanks for looking in to it!
My one comment would be that there was a lot of stress on being able to verify the ballot’s randomness and wording suggested that anybody could verify it, this is not the case by the sounds of it.