Monzo IPO for Crowdcube Investors

I totally agree with you, no one should be forced to sell but at the same time no one should be forced to hold indefinitely especially when other investors, staff and senior management have all been allowed to sell.

Crowdcube investors collectively hold a relatively small percentage of the company. Let’s say our collective stake could be worth in the region of £60m (1% at a £6bn valuation before fees). Even if only half of those shareholders wished to sell, the total would be roughly £30m. In the context of Monzo seeking to raise another £300–£400m in a new funding round ahead of a potential IPO, a structured and optional liquidity mechanism for long‑standing retail investors would not appear disproportionate.

Providing a clear and fair route to liquidity for early retail shareholders would help reduce frustration and would also demonstrate strong governance to future institutional investors. By contrast, appearing to overlook the issue while simultaneously presenting the company as committed to high governance standards could create unnecessary negative sentiment — something that benefits neither investors nor Monzo - especially if it became public that Monzo ignored us again while allowing others to sell.

1 Like

If someone has a personal emergency they should try contacting Crowdcube Nominees first, mentioning their circumstances and asking them for the current process for getting approval to sell Monzo shares. If they don’t answer emails in a reasonable time then try phoning them. They should be able to assist. They’re paid just to manage our shareholdings so it is their business, even if you know there’s going to be an element of “monzo board needs to approve it”. They should still be able to guide you as to how to go about that, if not facilitate it themselves.

Out of -what was it - 40-50,000 monzo crowdfunding investors, how many will have had a bankruptcy in those 10 years or lost a job, signed on and told dwp they own monzo shares. How many will sadly have died and had their estates come for the shares or had other unfortunate reasons to no longer be able to continue holding the shares? In 10 years there will probably have been hundreds of sales in these emergency circumstances. It isn’t impossible to sell them, you just need to go the same route the lawyers would do if you were bankrupt or passed away, rather than asking on online forums then realising it’s very difficult and forgetting about it for a year or two until you decide you want to sell them again and then asking the forums again then realising it’s still very difficult and forgetting again :unamused_face:

As far as getting large amounts of crowdfunding investors to lobby monzo for fast liquidity… I don’t think that is going to happen. Most investors invested in later rounds where the returns have not been as fantastic so it’s not such a big deal for them.

In the early rounds where much bigger percentage returns lie, most investors didn’t invest that much so the return isn’t that much of a big deal for them either. There are probably less than a thousand investors sitting on a paper profit that is a seriously life changing amount for them so that means tens of thousands who aren’t sweating too much about it.

Don’t get me wrong every investor will be excited at the prospect of having the choice to take profits if they want to, but that’s what the IPO is for. Other crowdfunding investors aren’t breaking down the doors of the Investor Relations team because they can see the company is working towards an IPO which will bring us liquidity in time. Hopefully sooner rather than later.

Let’s not make this seem like a big scandal that early backers have been done wrong, taken for granted and ignored. We wrote a few comments on a forum and received free stuff from a startup. It was fun and we have shares in a successful company to show for it. They don’t owe us anything and we aren’t employees so aren’t at the front of their minds when private investment rounds come around.

Yes it would have been amazing if there had been an occasion when they said “let’s include those early crowdfunders in this private sale alongside the employees”, however there is clearly a lot of complexity in including a different class of shares and investors and having to think carefully about what information needs to be made public in order to invite 40,000 crowdfunders to join a private round. I understand why some investors feel hard done by but also I see why they haven’t done it.

Every crowdfunding investor is sitting on some form of profit and an IPO will hopefully make all of us happy.

Hope it happens this year. Best of luck to you all.

7 Likes

I had been saying this for a while now, based on revenue multiple, Monzo has been massively undervalued. It should be around the 10x revenue mark.

I think Anil was trying to fight the corner of listing in the US since the iPO valuation multiples tend to be higher there but some of the people on the board didn’t like that, so they pushed him out.

I would be shocked if it was just £6-7bn . Basically impossible to be that low in my opinion, but there’s not been a new raise or substantial secondaries recently to gauge and updated valuation

I understand your point but European IPOs in the US have had incredibly mixed results…and mostly bad. The hype is overdone and often leads to terrible outcomes, just check out Klarna’s share price.. down c.75% on IPO price

You said…….

I disagree with that statement.

I don’t think it’s accurate to say Monzo owes crowdfunders nothing.

We may not be entitled to special treatment, but we are entitled to fair treatment. We didn’t donate money — we invested in a then‑aspiring bank at a stage when early support genuinely mattered. Expecting a practical route to liquidity isn’t unreasonable; it’s simply good governance and good investor relations.

BrewDog is a useful comparison. Their “Equity for Punks” investors were at least given a mechanism to trade or sell their shares on a secondary market, even if many chose to hold on in the hope of an IPO. It’s now widely reported that BrewDog has appointed advisers to explore a potential sale, but the point remains: they provided a structured route for retail investors to exit.

By contrast, Monzo crowdfunders have had no comparable mechanism.

Against the backdrop of public reporting about internal challenges and the fact that some staff and senior figures have been able to sell shares in past rounds, it’s understandable that long‑term crowdcube investors question whether they are being treated equitably — particularly for those of us also managing personal circumstances such as health issues.

You also said……..

If that’s the case, it would be genuinely helpful if Monzo or Crowdcube could publish anonymised statistics showing how many retail investors have actually been able to exit via the nominee route over the last decade. Transparency would go a long way.

2 Likes

Google Gemini thinks a monzo or revolut IPO would have an in-app participation feature like the crowdfunding rounds. I have no idea how it thinks or knows about this but thought it worth a share…

“As of January 19, 2026, the UK has officially replaced its old prospectus regime with the Public Offers and Admissions to Trading Regulations (POATRs). This is a game-changer for neobanks like Monzo and Revolut, specifically designed to make “retail offers” (selling shares to regular customers) faster and cheaper.

​Here is how you would likely be able to buy shares in these banks directly through their apps:

​1. The New “Three-Day” Rule

​Under the old system, a company had to keep its prospectus open for six working days before closing an IPO offer.

  • The Change: This has been slashed to three working days for IPOs with a retail element.

  • Why it matters: This reduces “market risk” for the bank. They can open the offer in the app on a Monday and close it by Wednesday, ensuring the price doesn’t fluctuate wildly while they wait for paperwork.

​2. Direct In-App Integration

​Neobanks are expected to use “Public Offer Platforms” (POPs) or third-party fintechs like PrimaryBid to facilitate the sale.

  • How it works: You would likely see a notification in your Monzo or Revolut app titled “Own a piece of [Bank Name].” * The Flow: You would review a simplified digital prospectus (now allowed under the new rules to be more “consumer-friendly”), enter the amount you wish to invest, and the funds would be “locked” in your account until the shares are allocated.

  • The “Hometown” Benefit: Monzo, in particular, has hinted at prioritizing its most active users (e.g., those with “Plus” or “Premium” accounts) for these allocations.

​3. The £5 Million Threshold

  • The Rule: Any offer under £5 million is now exempt from many of the heavy disclosure rules.

  • The Reality: Since Monzo and Revolut will be raising hundreds of millions, they won’t fit in this exemption. However, the new Admission Prospectus rules for the LSE make it much easier to “bolt-on” a retail offer to a large institutional fundraise without doubling the legal fees.

​How to Prepare (2026 Checklist)

​If you are planning to participate, here is what you should do now:

  • KYC Compliance: Ensure your ID and address details are fully up-to-date in your banking app. Regulatory checks for share buying are stricter than for opening a basic account.

  • Watch for “Expressions of Interest”: Before the official IPO, banks often run an “Expression of Interest” phase. While not a guarantee of shares, it puts you on the “whitelist” for the notification the moment the three-day window opens.

  • Monitor PrimaryBid: Even if the bank doesn’t build the tech into their own app, they will likely partner with PrimaryBid, which has become the “official” gateway for retail investors to access London IPOs at the same price as big institutional hedge funds.”

4 Likes

Good post !!!

Would Monzo or Revolut be the first to do this - I could see it being really popular.

I wonder why Gemini came back with this.

According to Tech.eu Diana Layfield has started as Monzo’s CEO, and the board has been reshaped around her: former CEO TS Anil has returned as vice‑chair, while Vinay Yarlagadda from GIC and Anu Hariharan, formerly of Y Combinator, have joined as new non‑executive directors, no existing board members have left.

let’s hope they now complete the secondary share sale and due to the delays of their own making they should include crowdcube investors.

any Crowdcube investors who wants to sell should make their feelings known by contacting Monzo’s Director of Investor Relations

soledadnager @monzo. Com

Remove the spaces

1 Like

What makes you think this will quicken any “secondary listing” pre IPO round ?

If anything it will lengthen it - if the press reports are / were true that TS was ousted because he wanted to IPO quicker than some non board member / large investors wanted - before what they considered full value was realised.

I sent an email to IR at Monzo and as expected they replied they don´t have any information of any secondary sale or potential IPO date.

1 Like

Welcome Stan

In my view, an IPO still feels at least a couple of years away. That’s mainly because, from the outside, it appears the board can’t agree on the timing and structure of a potential listing and if this continues it could be pushed even further back especially if markets conditions worsen due to Geopolitical issues.

I don’t have the luxury of waiting another 2 years making 12/13 years in total being locked in which should have been a 5 year investment for me.

I therefore think a secondary sale will happen first for 2 reasons.

  1. There were media reports last October (before the disagreements at board level were reported in the media) suggesting that another secondary transaction might be explored, with Morgan Stanley mentioned as being involved. Outlets like Sky News tend to be well‑sourced on these types of developments, although nothing has been confirmed by Monzo.
  2. It’s common for companies preparing for a future IPO to establish updated valuation benchmarks through private secondary transactions plus Monzo may also want to strengthen its capital position ahead of any future listing, especially given the last valuation was set in 2024.

If a secondary event does take place and retail investors from earlier crowdfunding rounds are “AGAIN” not given an opportunity to participate — while employees or other groups are — I think it would raise fair questions about why Crowdcube investors are not given equitable treatment.

Hi Gus25

Companies generally don’t confirm anything publicly until a formal announcement is released. My point was simply that it’s worth making your preferences known so Monzo is aware that many Crowdcube investors would like the option to participate in any future secondary sale, should one take place.

It’s also reasonable for early retail investors to express that they value equitable treatment if a secondary event does go ahead, particularly in terms of access and clarity around how different investor groups are included.

This reads as very entitled “should have been a 5 year investment for me”.

You have no rights as a common share holder to expect to be included in these liquidity events. You pay your money and take your chances, given that most venture investments fail you should just be extremely happy to have hit a winner this big, most people never will in their life.

7 Likes

I don’t have the luxury of waiting another 2 years making 12/13 years in total being locked in which should have been a 5 year investment for me.

You shouldn’t have invested then.

4 Likes

The average holding period for an individual private equity investment in a company is roughly 4 to 7 years.

12 years where Monzo valuation has, let’s face it, done poorly by comparable standards. It’s been too long for too poor a showing in returns. £2bn to £4.5bn in 7 years? no thank you. The S&P has done better.

Then maybe investors in here need to accept they made a poor choice choosing to invest in Monzo and not the S&P 500 at the time.

It’s very easy to look back now and say X has performed better than Monzo, if you knew X would perform better than Monzo then you probably wouldn’t have invested money in Monzo back then but you didn’t.

I could easily sit here and nit pick a handful of investments that have performed “better” than Monzo since the Crowdcube raise but that doesn’t prove anything.

Call me simple but to me investing is gambling on a companies success whether it be 2 year, 5 years, 7 year, 20 years e.t.c. that’s the terms you agree to when you enter and sign the contract :man_shrugging:

4 Likes

That’s simple.

Investing is parting with capital today in exchange for future cash flow, priced at a discount rate that compensates you above the risk-free rate.

Speculation is gambling. Two very different things. Monzo was a speculative gamble of course.

2 Likes

Investing in a single unlisted company is a high risk gamble. There is a good chance of ending up with zero.

3 Likes

The original Crowdcube round was valued at £30m (ish) from memory - £33m to £4.5bn is a pretty good return in my books, even accounting for dilution. £4.5bn is also conservative and I’d expect it to be much higher than this

Based on a number of disgruntled Crowdcube investor comments, (not those who require the money for genuine reasons - health, financial difficulty etc.) I’d say a number of investors made their investments without truly reading and understanding the terms and risks. Only themselves to blame if they’re unhappy

2 Likes

The one who raised it was merely saying, employees were given an exit opportunity - they wanted the same for them - I don’t think that’s an unreasonable request.

I’m a big Monzo fan and have held since day 1 and will keep holding after IPO - doesn’t mean I don’t want our friend here to be able to be given the opportunity to sell if they need / want to - alongside employees.

Ya’ll are just shills