Thanks so much for the feedback. I saw there was some discussion around: Why is the Under 16s account (and savings) in the parent/guardianās name?
From our research, we know that children form their relationship with money from an early age. So it was important that our Under 16s accounts can be managed by children as young as 6 years old, but with parental supervision. Parents and guardians also requested to have visibility of their childās spending and ability to set limits. To offer these features, the account is legally owned by the parent or guardian.
This means parents or guardians who set up the account also legally own the funds being saved and any interest earned. You can find out how this could impact your tax position on the government website.
We look forward to hear what you think when itās launched
With all due respect this doesnāt answer the question of why not do Bare Trust like most high street banks and your competitor Revolut? Revolut child accounts are also linked to parent accounts but child funds are in a bare trust.
Fair enough, to each their own. Think it will definitely cause them to lose some people who would rather not also inherit the tax bill of their children where they donāt have to but
Nationwide also. I have 3 nationwide future saver accounts. I guess one difference is that the kids canāt log on to see theirs, only through my account but that is possible if they had an app for the child, like Monzo do.
Comparison to competition is good, competition is good my friend embrace it. Bare Trust seems pretty normal for Banks and building societies in the UK Monzo chose a different route thatās fine was just asking a question thatās all.
Thatās the thing, I donāt think theyāll lose a single customer over this. My wife has our daughters account linked to her Monzo account and couldnāt care less about details like this
I think people who look at tax will care, to label it as everyone wonāt care isnāt accurate. Just because maybe you donāt care about taxes doesnāt mean others wont especially those with less