I understand your points but I think it’s a non-issue for me and my use case because I use my credit card for basically all spending and I’ll deal with the transfers later on.
If you don’t do that, then yea I wouldn’t be impressed with delayed transfers. It must be even worse when they have system issues at your bank.
I do, but don’t always keep one to hand. They’re often for the most dire of emergencies only, or pre determined purchases for section 75 protections when I need them. Didn’t have one on me that day with the trains as I was only visiting family and didn’t expect to need it!
That’s fair, I think it’s just a nice reassurance to have. Marcus are quick, but they have left me waiting over a day at the weekend before.
This. I still split smaller amounts into my Marcus account for redundancy. They’re both linked to different accounts too, though that was by accident, but it helps for resiliency too. Atom is linked to Monzo, Marcus to Barclays. So that’s my visa/MasterCard coverage too.
I’m not that bothered to be fair if it takes minutes or a few hours or so, I never get myself into a situation where I’m going to need instant access to money by a transfer. Could be the day when the faster payments system has a wobble and collapses.
There will be little reason to hold savings anymore. Everything can just stay in Monzo pots/Starling spaces for easier access. Or invest anything that’s not an emergency fund*
*This is not financial advice, just my own humble opinion. Everyone should undertake their own research and make their own informed financial decisions
Honestly, if thinks keep heading down this road, I’ll wind up questioning if an emergency fund is even worth it.
May as well throw everything into stocks and use my credit card as my emergency fund should I ever need it. Stocks are easy enough to liquidate in time to cover a credit card bill.
I’ve been playing on a very small scale for about 6 months now, and compared with savings, I have done pretty well, both investing, and trading.
I’d never recommend it to anyone who couldn’t afford the losses though.
After all, it’s just another form of gambling.
Yes savings in a bank account shouldn’t be compared to stocks. Stocks have been in a good run but they can fall quickly. If someone sees their shares fall by 50% it’ll feel very different to the current situation in the market. Stocks should be invested in with a 5 year plus time horizon, nothing else.
Indeed. The percentages, or split percentages, get increasingly more pathetic. Means that in real terms, you’re losing money because inflation is higher than interest earned.
I opened a Marcus account when they started. Last year I calculated what my now pathetic interest would amount to, then calculated what I could get for certain dividend stocks. Ended up taking 50% out of my Marcus account, and putting roughly 50% into a renewables fund (TRIG) with a steady history and roughly 50% into Hipgnosis. I don’t expect either to do gangbusters, nor do I expect either to fall, and I should get more from dividend return than I would from leaving the money in Marcus.
I accept this isn’t a given, and that there is some risk. But for me, the risk of ‘losing’ money by leaving it in Marcus was a much greater risk. I certainly wouldn’t advocate taking money out of savings and ‘betting’ it on what one might hope to be the next Tesla!
The 50% of my previous holdings that I still kept in Marcus is my absolute buffer; that is, I know that I’m losing money in real terms there, but it’s my emergency fund and what I’ll need to dip in to if I have any unexpected catastrophic bills, or if I lose my job and need to keep myself going until I find another one. It sucks that I’m not making any real gains on it, but I absolutely can’t lose it (so mustn’t be invested) and I absolutely mustn’t spend it unthinkiningly (so it must be segregated from my normal bank accounts.
I was clearing out some old paperwork the other day and found an advert for a savings account offering 8% interest. I miss when that was considered, if anything, a low rate
4,000 x 1.03 = 120 / 12 = £10 a month, which is equal to the Freetrade Plus fee.
It’s certainly a great deal to keep your cash waiting to be invested but if you aren’t waiting to invest or using it simply to cover the Plus fee and enjoy the benefits for “free” then it is not worth it.