Competitor update

20th March. Since then crowdfunding shareholders have been trying to offload their shares on the secondary market Initially offering a 10 or 20 percent discount, today someone offered to sell their shares at a 50 percent discount

2 Likes

damnā€¦ thats like watching a car crash in real time :dizzy_face::open_mouth::scream:

2 Likes

Hereā€™s what happened to Tandem - itā€™s definitely not great :anguished:

It was my understanding that most do it to cover off the difference in rates between the end of day on Friday and the start of play on Monday. Iā€™ve had a fair few small refunds from Supercard due to this. Perhaps we could ask Monzo about it.

Fire is more comparable to CashPlus and CardOneBanking, than it is to Tide. Fire have a myriad of different fees and an application fee. I donā€™t know the situation in Ireland, but I think it will struggle against competitors in the UK.

Wasnā€™t aware of Monese, it has a Ā£5 per month cover charge. I donā€™t know what the companyā€™s user base is, but it hasnā€™t enjoyed the publicity of Monzo, and the others.

Definitely interesting times ahead. Look forward to seeing it all play out.

Just a quick tip, if you search this topic for the names of any of these competitors, a lot more infoā€™s been shared about them already, for example -

|231.5x249.5

also Tide deal with business banking & Passion Capital (one of the investors backing Monzo) are invested in them so theyā€™re definitely not going to be a Monzo (or Revolut) competitor. Itā€™s a very different type of business, although they have a reasonably similar approach to utilising technology.

2 Likes

My post in reply to the article on the future of Fintech. It was moved here after talk of competitors.

1 Like

This made it sound like you might be comparing Tide with Revolut -

so I just thought Iā€™d mention that :slight_smile:

You made some good points / asked great questions in your first post which Iā€™ll pick up on later, when I have time :thinking:

I expect youā€™re right about that.

I think itā€™s too soon to say whether their approach is going to work, they only launched 8 months ago! But this is another example of a FinTech bank without bank branches (which make up 40% of the legacy bankā€™s costs) which should help.

It is. Itā€™s worth bearing in mind that they offered cash incentives to encourage users to sign up though, whereas Monzo havenā€™t & are at over 150k users now.

In addition to the markup at weekends, thereā€™s also a fair useage policy which limits the amount of ATM withdrawals you can make & FX conversions. The new premium product increases the former limit & removes the latter so there must be some customers who pay fees when they go over those thresholds, at the moment.

It should, although it didnā€™t sell out that fast, especially considering that it enabled users to invest in the next crowdfunding round.

The CEO has suggested that they wonā€™t, although that article suggests theyā€™ve keeping their options open.

At the moment, that looks like one of the key differences between them & Monzo / Starling - the latter can earn income on optional overdrafts whereas it looks like Revolut will be reliant on perhaps not so optional, fees. Although it looks like Revolut have some other revenue generating products on the way.

There are 65 million current accounts in the UK at the moment & none of the challengers have even a million users so itā€™s the legacy banks thatā€™re really the competition here.

Simon makes a pretty compelling case for the reasons why they wonā€™t be able to fight back here or at least, not quickly enough.

Atomā€™s business model is so similar to the legacy bankā€™s (just without the branches) that we can probably safely ignore them. It doesnā€™t look like Tandem will have a banking license anytime soon so you can bundle them together with Monese & Revolut.

I believe that technology will be deciding factor here:

  • The prepaid card providers are reliant on 3rd parties like Wirecard & GPS and weā€™ve seen how that limitā€™s a companyā€™s ability to innovate & avoid outages. Monzo will be able to do some very interesting things once theyā€™re their own issuer, processor & are working with their own ledger etc.

  • When I asked Tom, he said that leveraging data & identity will be much more important than the overdrafts long term. I assume that being a bank helps with the identity piece.

  • Monzoā€™s adoption of a microservices architecture should enable them to innovate at a much faster pace than the competiton.

  • The biggest tech companies are all trying to become platforms. The most obvious example is Slack which creates a central hub for users to work in, then enables easy access to data / tools from other providers. Monzo is trying to do the same thing & thatā€™s what should enable it to reach much larger scale (& revenue) than a financial services provider.

So when you combine those factors, it looks like Monzo & Starling are best placed to capture the largest portion of market share & I doubt that all of the challengers will survive. Itā€™s too soon to say who will end up winning that battle but Iā€™m sure you can guess who Iā€™m betting on :wink:

7 Likes

Now that Monzo have the full banking license, I thought Iā€™d point out some of the differences between Monzoā€™s license & Starlingā€™s (the most similar challenger bank to Monzo).

Unfortunately Iā€™m not sure what the implications of these permissions are & Iā€™d be interested to know, as I expect theyā€™re linked to Monzoā€™s business model. This might be one that @paul could explain?

Accepting deposits:

  • Eligible Counterparty
  • Professional

Dealing in investments as principal:

Customer Type:

  • Eligible Counterparty
  • Professional

Exercising/having right to exercise lenderā€™s rights and duties under a regulated credit agreement (excluding high-cost short-term credit, bill of sale agreement, and home collected credit agreement)

Monzo also have several waivers / discretions listed :thinking: And itā€™s good to see that they can provide debt counselling!

1 Like

Waivers/discretions are the opposite of limitations and are a positive thing

1 Like

Be prepared for a creepy twilight zone!!

Seems a lot more complainy on that side of the fence.

2 Likes

Haha itā€™s confusing to switch between the two

Iā€™m a member of both communities and I find the revolut one to be a bit depressing. I was going to invest in revolut but decided against it based on the amount of problems I see reported.

Revolutā€™s support seems very patchy, with long waits and poor responses to customers. Combined with the downgrade in features, it made me doubt their long term survival.

3 Likes
1 Like

As the first UK licenced bank to launch a public API in keeping with the ambitions of PSD2 and the Open Banking initiative, the APIs enable external developers to create products and services that work together with Starlingā€™s banking app.

*sigh*

4 Likes

Getting bored of Starling now, they seems to care more about journalists and developers than people who would actually use them and test functionality, and all they seem to post is how great they are etcā€¦

Let people use it, and they will tell you how good it isā€¦ ala Monzo :slight_smile:

8 Likes

mad late to the gameā€¦ yawn

Facebook coming at cha

1 Like

we had Tom in the TransferWise office last year (thatā€™s when I got my card :credit_card:)

I was actually surprised to see Starling Bank to close a partnership with TW before Monzo :-/

4 Likes

I wonder who will ship it first / at all? :smirk: