If you read my actual post and quoted it in its entirety, you wouldn’t have had to go into “deeper introspection” because none of this is what I called out.
Anyway let’s move on, don’t need thinkpieces on this, especially 24hrs+ after. The discourse has moved on.
When Nationwide had a long outage affecting payments and direct debits (so people couldn’t be paid, bills bounced), I asked if they’d provide a post mortem and they said no for security reasons. I guess it’s just not something banks of any reasonable size would do.
Got the same email, however, as I was not affected by it, strangely, I did not bother completing the survey.
Nothing for them to learn from me.
Doug_hboy
(Always be alert because the World always needs lerts.)
5039
Shame they won’t provide reasons why the outage occurred and why their updates were nonexistent. I understand they don’t want to give out information that competitors can obtain but it would increase confidence if they were upfront IMHO.
Yeah, I’m sure they could give a high level overview, something like a system had a configuration error, was hard to roll back and affected other systems, they’ve put in X and Y procedure to stop it happening again. I do web development and can understand server config changes being made that break something or get pushed to 100 servers and it’s a nightmare to get them all back, you can give a high level explanation of that without giving away trade secrets or risking security. I guess most people won’t care or understand either way but it does seem a bit weird that they (or really any bank) can have a major 24-48 hour outage and just be like “all good now guys, carry on”, would be good to have some reassurance that problem won’t happen again.
So Chase are clearly thinking about what rewards and incentives to offer going forward - just did a survey with a series of different options - this is just some examples: