The experience isnāt where I want it to be for a product thatās so important ā and making this better is a top priority right now. The product functionality, availability and experience all need to be better, so rest assured we have teams actively working to do this and unlock the full potential of joint accounts.
Lots of this work is technical/foundational so not necessarily all of it is stuff you can āseeā but will make a huge difference. Other bits are more visible and related to bringing the joint account experience up to par and fully-functional. A big one is Plus/Premium support as you mention.
Iām excited to share more details pretty soon so watch this space ā thanks for raising this and all your feedback on this elsewhere on the forum. I hear you and we are working on it.
Absolutely! Weāre already looking into this as part of the app redesign. The idea is to make it super easy to get all the information you need at a glance above the fold.
As you scroll down you can get into discovery mode, which results in a cleaner, much more decluttered experience. The app evolution team will keep sharing more about this here, including designs
Compared to the US, I think itās the sophistication around wealth/investments. The US has a very strong culture in this area particularly in retail. We are actively working on investments as you know, and Iām personally very confident weāll close that gap soon. So pretty excited about that
Cannot solve the plushie issue sorry, that is above my pay grade
I use multiple phones on purpose, both Androids and iPhones of different sizes, particularly to avoid that bias you mentioned.
We are always looking at new card designs and options. Do you have any suggestions?
Most if not all of the most requested features over the last few years will be addressed over the next quarters: Pot to Pot transfers, a new home experience, and many more . I mentioned Plus and Premium for joint accounts earlier. Weāre accelerating our pace of product development quite a bit. So Iām looking forward to making them available to you all!
Thanks for raising this super important point. To me customer support means the journey for a customer. Itās not just your chat conversation or phone call with one of our customer operations people (although that is very important obviously).
For product ā itās my responsibility to resolve the challenge or meet the need of the customer so the problem they contact us about either doesnāt happen in the first place, or weāve resolved it well before it gets to the point you reach out.
One of the things Iāve been doing a lot is building strong links between our Product org and our Customer Operations org, so weāre looking at our customersā journeys end-to-end. Itās important to understand the userās lifecycle.
So actually we need to do a better job on the whole journey. Weāll be making lots of improvements on this, which weāll be sure to share with you here. We know what the top issues are and weāre working to address them decisively.
That said ā āProductā also means the product for our customer service teams, where weāre developing some new tools for our COps so they are fully empowered and have all the information and support they need to deliver the best experience when it does come to that chat or phone call.
Thanks for these answers. Genuinely interesting, thank you.
Coming back on UK joint accounts, though, I know it might be difficult for you to talk about, but itād be really helpful to have some sort of insight into why the experience isnāt where we all want it to be.
It seems to be that there are two things:
Feature parity (however you define that)
Limitations on opening joint accounts.
Youāve covered number one (and thank you so much for that - Iām sure thatāll make a whole bunch of folk super happy) but can you directly address number two?
Without pushing the point too far, itās absolutely the elephant in the room. I think itās the not knowing more than anything - can you tell us whatās up? Why are new joint accounts so tightly controlled? And if you canāt (as opposed to wonāt), can you tell us that you canāt - and perhaps an indication of why you canāt?
Sorry to have gone all Jeremy Paxman on you (that might be an aged/cultural reference - sorry!*) and thanks for your continued engagement over Easter too!
* Paxman was famous for his difficult and forensic political interviews. He once famously asked the same question 12 times over and overā¦
Hi @fernandofanton and welcome. Thanks for answering some questions for far. Really pleased to hear joint accounts are being worked on.
My question is around open banking. Monzoās open banking interface is the best Iāve seen and itās personally great I can see my other accounts all within Monzoās app, and that it integrates with Trends. The missing piece with open banking for me is external savings accounts. How do you think Monzo will tackle that given the desire is still for Monzo to become the financial control centre?
Bit unfair. Told us it was something they were aware of and are working hard to rectify.
Fernando has the tricky job of trying to answer our questions without giving too much info away. While some answers are (perhaps necessarily) vague, sounds like quite a lot coming down the pipe which should keeps us all happy (until we find something else to moan about )
It is obviously early days but we are playing with some tools internally already.
We are just learning about the opportunities and possibilities of it, but no doubt things will not be the same. This is a new and revolutionary platform.
The data/API angle is definitely interesting as well as the āJarvisā approach. Maybe we should do a particular session on this topic later on with the community. Weāll bring some ideas to share.
I always pay attention to the competition and the industry in general. But of course, we will always primarily be driven by our customersā needs and how we can deliver on them, and not by what others are doing! This is what I mean by āfirst principlesā and we always look at problems that way.
The Get Paid Early drag interaction has been described as a 'signature moment '.
However, Monzo really should allow customers the facility to opt out of this and ideally offer the option to automate the process.
While it may be nice the first or second time you see it, I find afterwards it just adds additional friction and delay to the process making it a negative interaction (for me) not a positive one.
Personally, I donāt think itās a must. Iāve met great product managers who are not technical at all. For some products it does help though. I generally encourage even non technical folks to learn a bit of coding if they can. Doesnāt mean that they will check in code into production though. In the end, itās just one team where everyone brings their unique expertise to find the best solution. So the more you understand each other the better. Thatās why I encourage engineers to talk to users, read research, dive into the data, and non-engineers to get into the code, even if a little bit.
I love to engage with engineers as much as I can, generally around a whiteboard. I am an engineer at heart in the end (started coding when I was 11 and never looked back). There is an inner beauty and peace in coding which to me is a special feeling. And now with chatGPT, everyone can ācodeā in plain English! That is truly remarkable.
Not sure there is such a thing as a typical day tbh. But I generally start with 1-2 hours for myself that I use to either play with Labs features, catch up on the latest user research weāre doing ā or read the community forum. I also spent at least 1-2 hours per week on average talking directly to customers. Weāve actually set up a program so everyone at Monzo can do this really easily. In the end, there is no replacement for knowing our usersā problems deeply and obsessing about how to solve them.
I heard about Monzo many years ago when it first launched. And I was always a massive fan as I thought it was one of the very few truly disruptive companies. By this I mean ones that truly make a difference in peopleās lives by redefining an entire industry, particularly one that is deeply entrenched already. Personally, I always thought of Apple, Tesla, and Monzo in that category. Would love to hear your thoughts on others as well.
I really like both Flex and the Safety Net Pots as I think they both represent how Monzo can help people improve their financial outcomes. We are bringing a lot of improvements to Flex to make it the best credit card/BNPL product out there, making it super easy to understand what is more convenient for you. Safety Nets empowers people to easily calculate the amount of money they need to put away, while earning interest on it. The idea is people who use this feature should be much less likely to enter negative financial outcomes due to lack of planning. In the end, we want users to learn more, without much effort, and get better outcomes when they use Monzo.
Both! Nalbandian was maybe one of the best technical players Iāve ever seen. His backhand was brilliant, he hit the ball so early, great technique. Del Potroās forehand was just ridiculous. So itās hard for me to choose one of them. If I have to pick one tennis player I have to go with Roger. He was just amazing to watch at Wimbledon. I mean, where do I start? It was just an artistic experience.
I get that Monzo would be want to be the one stop banking & budgeting solution - I love Flex and have a loan with Monzo as well as use it for all monthly Direct Debits. The only exception is weekly grocery, petrol and other debit card payments - for the moment I use Chase purely for the 1% Cashback - and whilst itās not mega dollars I get in return, the chance of a Ā£100 plus extra cash in my wallet per year is certainly better than nothing.
I wonder if Monzo have looked into offering Cashback even if tied to the Plus or Premium accounts?