As a recovering alcoholic who has been sober for many years, I think the gambling restriction function in Monzo is an excellent excellent idea.
Why should not an alcohol purchase restriction function not be added to the app? Once added and activated it cannot be undone. This would be of tremendous benefit to alcoholics. Yes, of course they may Find another way, but it least it puts it there in their consciousness in the same way that the gambling restriction does.
Alcoholism is a very serious disease, and Monzo is becoming one of the most popular banks in the UK. Having this function could be of tremendous benefit, and could in fact save lives.
My question is whether or not this idea has already been floated by the technical & executive Monzo team?
Also, having worked as an operations manager within an investment bank for over a decade, and with the problem which I was happy to disclose here, this would be something which I would be honoured and privileged to be involved in if it is something which Monzo thinks is worth going ahead with.
I would welcome any comments from the community and from Monzo itself regarding this idea which struck me only the other day. Thoughts folks?
1 Like
tbutz
(đłď¸âđ Producer of "low value commentary")
2
I think the issue is that you could exclude alcohol retailers specifically (Bargain Booze I guess), but if you were to buy alcohol from a supermarket or even a corner shop, thereâs nothing there for Monzo to identify your purchase and prevent it.
Gambling is easy to block because they can block by merchant category.
Alcohol is harder to block because they canât block in the same way.
As @tbutz says, because supermarkets sell alcohol as well as all the non-alcohol things you need, itâs going to be very difficult to recognise this properly.
I think that as the technology improves, they will be able to identify it. The barcodes on any item are all registered. Monzo could accumulate from that database thus preventing any attempted alcohol purchases from being allowed to be processed. There would be other methods available as well
It would be a challenge for the technical team⌠There is no doubt about that. But the benefits could be enormous.
tbutz
(đłď¸âđ Producer of "low value commentary")
6
The technical issue is that, when you pay with your card Monzo has a tiny amount of time to authorise or not.
I suspect you would need the process to change so that the content of the purchase (i.e. itemised list) is sent to Monzo prior to the actual payment processing being performed, and that would be a fundamental shift in the way things operate.
Edit: Also, retailers would not want to give up that info. They are very protective of their data.
Having worked in part of an organisation that deals with Barcodes and sharing that with retailers;
shudder
Just getting the right data to Tesco/Sainsbury/Other major retailers are available accurately enough is a big enough problem, let alone that being useful for making authorisation decisions on.
The way Retailers currently handle that type of data as well would be difficult to manage; the categories of âproducts with alcohol in themâ and âalcoholic beverageâ are not neccesarily mutually exclusive, at least in the way Retailers collect product info, and so youâd get a lot of false positives / negatives in your set.
And if the problem is overcome by walking 20m to the nearest corner shop that doesnât use an epos system⌠It seems like it wouldnât be foolproof enough to be a valuable system.
Also the other side of it, with the rise of Big Data and schemes like Nectar, I think that the big retailers would want to monetise that data flow.
I think the route of supermarkets blocking alcohol purchases with a certain card is a much easier way to implement it and may be the only feasible way to implement it, although Google/apple pay changing card numbers will make it harder.
That or the other way round, where retailers send just a notification that the purchase contains alcohol and Monzo makes payment based on whether thatâs authorised or not.
Would be nice if this stopped the need for ID checks too on age restricted items, but I too easy to give your card to someone. Though could require fingerprint if paying by device.
Canât see it working to be fair, I doubt that the major retailers would even want to spend time programming that into their systems, then you have small local corner shops that maybe donât have an EPOS system so rules those out straight away
The idea the OP suggests is a great idea but, as the previous posts illustrate, itâs technically so difficult it verges on not possible.
Now, what if the only place to buy alcohol (outside of a licensed premise) was in an shop that specifically sells only alcohol? Suddenly the idea of blocking access via your bank account becomes easy to implement.
Other countries already do this and anyone whoâs been to one will know it works perfectly. It doesnât stop responsible drinking (itâs a minor inconvenience at worst) and it really helps drive down alcohol abuse.
This would be an incredibly divisive policy so I canât see any politician seriously pursuing it but my goodness what a difference it would make to the nation!
Only workable way would be to allow us to build our own lists of âdonât let me shop hereâ but, as ever, weâd also need a way to edit that list so it wouldnât be much of a restriction (a soft block is about all it would do).
Something like that could be used for other addictive habits that people want to break/avoid, but is still largely up to the user and as such, when âuserâ decides they want âaddictive itemâ then all they do is unblock from their list and⌠whatâs the point?
I guess the same could be said for gambling block.
For me the most effective way would be to see exactly how much Iâm spending on the thing Iâm trying to cut down on.
So custom categories and the ability to split a transaction into more than one category would do it (coz supermarkets). This way I could have an alcohol category (for example) and see how much I spent on it monthly with the aim of cutting back for the following month.