Our overdrafts are changing

As good a reason as any to consider it might not be a great thing to do.

I think I’m putting this change on the steadily growing pile of reasons to move away from Monzo.

Personally I’ll only really be affected by the removal of the £20 buffer (which, why was that removed? No reason given in the post). But the main things are: you’re giving a lower rate to those already in a better financial position, and still think that playing on people’s cognative biases with rates like 19% and 39% is cool. It’s not.

Remember when you wanted to be better than that, Monzo?

4 Likes

I’m not sure what the big deal is here. Overdrafts are a type of loan. Providing a loan involves risk on the part of the lender. Some customers are more risky than others. This does not necessarily correlate to how ‘wealthy’ they are, it is related to the risk of not getting paid back (which is affected by more than income/wealth). Monzo could either penalise the lower risk customers by charging everyone a higher rate, or penalise the higher risk customers by not offering them overdrafts at all. Or they can have multiple rates.

11 Likes

Whether it’s 13% of Monzo users or 13% of overdraft users it is still 13% too many

Especially when many of the 13% are likely to be in the 39.9% group and may well be living close to the breadline or otherwise struggling financially as it is which is why their credit scores are lower

If you were to lend to 2 groups of people with bad and good credit, you’d need to charge the group of people with bad credit history a higher fee to mitigate the risk. I’m not sure how this is a problem, it’s a tried and tested approach by most companies that offer credit facilities and applies to credit cards, loans, mortgages and overdrafts.
The same thing also applies when people take out insurance, those considered more likely to claim pay a higher premium.

2 Likes

Does anyone who’s wringing their hands about those ‘living close to the breadline’ have experience or expert knowledge on the financial issues facing people in that situation? Or is this a lot of assumptions by people without any experience of financial hardship?

3 Likes

You cannot be suggesting Champagne Socialism Sensationalism?

:joy:

3 Likes

It wasn’t the same score, monzo told TransUnion its criteria and TransUnion generated a score and this one was completely different to the one we see, so lenders don’t see the pointless score

People seem to be asking why Monzo has removed the £20 buffer. Isn’t it obvious? To make up the money they have lost by going to an APR method rather than the fixed 50p method.

I agree with the shift to an APR method as a good move but it is a shame they removed the free buffer.

5 Likes

Removed a lot of complexity though taking away the buffer.
For many the fixed charge kept things very simple.

This is the uncertain part on if it’s the actual “score”, or of it feeds into a Monzo system to generate an internal score - I asked for clarification, but waiting to hear.

From my POV, as long as things are clear, and people are being treated equally, I’m not too bothered if the rates are more than other banks (people have options, Monzo won’t be the best at everything).

The issue with any lending from Monzo seems to be the “finger in the air” way of judging each customer. No one can tell for certain what the criteria is, and the results make for some confusing reading.

1 Like

Which dev told you that Monzo submit criteria to TransUnion to get an entirely separate score? Fair play if that’s fact, that’s news to me and I’ve spoken with about five devs in depth about it and totally under the impression that Monzo used “the score” given, nothing about submitting criteria to get that special score that’s different. That sounds plausible as TransUnion could have a service that does scoring out the box.

Every cra offer this service, it’s common sense, the lender choose the criteria, no the cra, they’re not lending money

1 Like

Is there any proof of this, or are you assuming based on the random anecdotes posted on the forum?

I’m speaking from personal experience and comments on this forum.

I’m not saying that there isn’t a method in place, I’m saying it doesn’t seem to make rhyme or reason.

I know others don’t, but it would be nice if Monzo said, “we can’t currently offer you a loan/OD for these reasons”.

When you have people with near perfect credit reports who aren’t offered a loan, you do have to wonder how stable the algorithm is.

1 Like

Or one might wonder if credit reports are just a meaningless scam :open_mouth::grin:

1 Like

Ha, undoubtedly so! But if that’s what Monzo are using as their judgement, it would be great to know.

It’s the one area where I don’t think Monzo are anymore forthcoming than the high street banks - It just seems shrouded in mystery! :joy:

1 Like

IMO from reading Monzo’s posts about the tiers. The likely people who will get offered this higher % wouldn’t have been eligible for an overdraft previously.
By introducing the higher rate they can give more people the option to have an overdraft if they wish.

Just because starling has one rate and it’s low could mean they hardly offer overdrafts to anyone.

It’s about giving the user a choice if they’d like one or not.

1 Like

Offering expensive overdrafts to people that Monzo previously thought were at risk of not being able to pay one back.

Sounds like a pretty terrible idea.

1 Like

Yeah I see your point it’s a tough balance to get right IMO

1 Like

Common sense and what :monzo: do don’t always go :handshake: though