Round-Up Safety net (Rounding down)

Hey!!

I’ve had this idea as an extension to the round-up feature for a while and I’d like to suggest a potential extension to the existing Round-Ups feature: a Round-Up Safety Net.

The idea is simple: Round-Ups would continue to work exactly as they do now, but if a customer is slightly short of the money needed for a card transaction, their Round-Up Pot could automatically cover the small difference.

The key principle would be:

Saving takes priority. The Round-Up Pot is only used as a fallback when it’s genuinely needed.

How it could work

IF the customer has enough money in their main account to complete the transaction:

→ Process the payment normally.
→ Apply the existing Round-Up as usual.
→ Do not touch the Round-Up Pot.

IF the customer is short by £1 or less:

→ Check the Round-Up Pot.
IF the pot contains enough to cover the shortfall, transfer exactly the amount needed and complete the transaction.

IF the shortfall is greater than £1:

→ Do not use the Round-Up Pot.
→ Follow the customer’s existing overdraft or insufficient-funds behaviour.

IF the Round-Up Pot doesn’t contain enough to cover the entire shortfall:

→ Do not partially use the pot.
→ Follow the customer’s existing overdraft or insufficient-funds behaviour.

Example

Main account: £5.23
Round-Up Pot: £3.20
Card transaction: £5.59

The customer is 36p short.

The Safety Net would:

  • Take £5.23 from the main account.

  • Take 36p from the Round-Up Pot.

  • Complete the £5.59 transaction.

  • Leave £2.84 in the Round-Up Pot.

The customer wouldn’t need to manually transfer money or have their payment declined over a relatively small shortfall.

Why I think this could work

I see this as a micro-safety net rather than an alternative spending account.

The existing Round-Up feature encourages customers to build savings automatically and invisibly. This would give those savings a secondary purpose: protecting the customer from the occasional small shortfall.

It could potentially reduce unnecessary declined transactions while still encouraging customers to save, because the system would always prioritise the main account and normal Round-Ups first.

The hierarchy would essentially be:

Main account → Normal Round-Up → Round-Up Safety Net → Existing overdraft/insufficient funds → Declined payment

I’d also suggest that customers could optionally set safeguards, such as a maximum amount that can be taken from the pot per transaction or per day (up to £1/ transaction and £3/day), or a minimum balance that must remain in the pot at all times.

I’m no coder, but I think this could be a relatively simple extension of an existing feature that provides a useful bit of flexibility without turning savings into an unrestricted spending account, especially for those of us who are living close to their available balance and occasionally experience small fluctuations in their account.

Thanks for considering it!

1 Like

Pass.

People need to take accountability for their money.

2 Likes

This is never ever ever going to happen.

People would just complain that “Monzo” are spending their savings. There’s no real advantage to it. If you’re getting transactions declining because you don’t have the money in the right place, then you need to manage it in a better way.

2 Likes

Or people could see it decline, realise they’ve got no money and use their space’s funds by transferring them to the main account?

Or plan their money better to begin with?

1 Like

Or, use a credit card.

1 Like

How does that help if they don’t have enough credit limit available?

1 Like

This would go against the whole point of saving your round-ups in the first place.

You’d also get complaints from people whose payments declined when they were just over the £1.00 limit. “I was only £1.01 short and Monzo has declined the payment”.

1 Like

Imagine the daily fail headline:

SCANDAL Monzo didn’t move money for bread

2 Likes