I was thinking reverse, so they add any and all bill splits and recover the costs by you multiple times.
I’m not in any means saying your idea is invalid, I just ponder on bigger picture and the damage that could be done, unless a clause in said agreement was if disputed to be refunded no issue, but then also, how do you prove otherwise.
I think it’s a very complex situation
Edit: to add, just in the same manner as a joint account.
Yeah I understand, it’s quite complex. Maybe there’s a different solution to our problem.
The issue we have is that we have very different credit scores and so a joint account poses a risk. We’d like a joint account as the trust is there 100%.
Maybe there’s a totally different solution. A joint pot maybe?
This could impact the other, when being reviewed for credit elsewhere.
There’s difference in mine and my partners credit file and we went to joint account and not seen much impact from this (though totally based on individual circumstances) and we solely use it for bills at the moment.
Maybe something similar but in the form of a pot as opposed to a tab. We each put money into the “shared pot” and can each freely use it for bill splits.
Just sounds like the inverse of a shared tab. I just use a shared tab with my partner, and we may pay it off ad-hoc if there’s a big payment or whatever.
Good luck in your search for the perfect solution.